Application, Underwriting and Policy Delivery — practice questions
14% of the exam ≈12 real questions 18 free questions here
Applications, receipts, insurable interest, consumer reports, contract law, replacement and policy delivery: 12 of the 85 scored questions. Expect one question on when coverage really begins and one on what an agent may not do with an application.
Where people lose points
- A conditional receipt backdates coverage only if the applicant proves insurable as applied for.
- Insurable interest has to exist when the policy is issued, not at the death.
- Warranties must be literally true; representations only substantially true.
- A Florida replacement runs through Rule 69O-151.007 and the signed Form OIR-B2-312.
Drill: Application, Underwriting and Policy Delivery
18 free questions from this domain, each with an explanation and a cited source. Timed at real exam pace.
18 questions
Pass line: 70%, same as the real exam
See the answer and explanation right after each question.
Questions and answers, explained
All 10 questions above, with the correct answer and why it is correct. Everything here is on application, underwriting and policy delivery.
During underwriting, an insurer receives coded information about an applicant from the Medical Information Bureau (MIB). Which statement about the MIB is TRUE?
Why: The MIB's information comes from prior applications submitted to member insurers, and its purpose is to alert underwriters to discrepancies that deserve further investigation. An insurer may not decline or rate an applicant solely on MIB data — the information must be verified through other sources, such as an attending physician's statement.
Reference Outline IX (Field Underwriting Procedures): sources of insurability information — MIB
A Florida agent is taking an application for a life insurance policy that she knows will replace the applicant's existing life policy. Under Florida's replacement rule, no later than the time she takes the application, the agent must
Why: Rule 69B-151.006, F.A.C. (Duties of Replacing Agent), requires the replacing agent to present the Notice to Applicant Regarding Replacement of Life Insurance (Form OIR-B2-312) no later than at the time of taking the application; both parties sign it and it is left with the applicant, with a completed copy submitted to the replacing insurer along with the application. Under Rule 69B-151.005, F.A.C., the agent also submits signed statements as to whether replacement is involved. Notifying the existing insurer is a duty of the replacing insurer, not the agent, and no advance DFS approval is required.
Reference Outline IX (Field Underwriting Procedures): replacement; Rules 69B-151.005–.006, F.A.C.
An individual life or health application is generally divided into parts. Which statement about the agent's report is CORRECT?
Why: Part I of the application gathers general personal data and Part II gathers medical history, while the agent's report is a separate confidential section in which the agent conveys observations and personal knowledge to the underwriter; it is not shown to the applicant and is not attached to the policy. Because it is not part of the entire contract, statements in it cannot be used to contest the policy the way the applicant's own application answers can.
Reference Outline IX (Field Underwriting Procedures): parts of the application and the agent's report
How does a binding (unconditional) premium receipt differ from a conditional receipt?
Why: A binding receipt creates temporary insurance effective on the date of the receipt and lasting a stated period, often 30 or 60 days, regardless of the applicant's insurability, whereas a conditional receipt provides coverage only if the applicant is later determined insurable as applied for. Choice B describes what happens when no premium is collected with the application at all — in that case coverage begins only at delivery with payment and a statement of continued good health.
Reference Outline IX (Field Underwriting Procedures): initial premium and receipt consequences
An applicant deliberately says nothing about a serious condition his doctor diagnosed last month, even though the application asks about recent diagnoses. This is BEST described as
Why: Concealment is the intentional withholding of a material fact the applicant has a duty to disclose, and it can void the contract. A misrepresentation, by contrast, is an untrue statement actually made; a warranty is a statement guaranteed to be true and made part of the contract, while waiver and estoppel concern the voluntary surrender or the loss of a known right.
Reference Outline IX (Field Underwriting Procedures): concealment, representations, and warranties
An applicant pays the initial premium and receives a temporary insurance agreement (binding receipt) dated March 3. He dies of a heart attack on March 9, before underwriting is complete. The insurer later determines he would have been declined. Assuming the receipt's stated conditions were met, what must the insurer do?
Why: A binding (temporary insurance) receipt puts coverage in force on the receipt date for a stated period, commonly 60 days, whether or not the applicant later proves insurable; the insurer's remedy is to decline the permanent policy when the period ends. Choice B states the rule for a conditional receipt, where coverage depends on insurability — that is exactly the condition a binding receipt removes. Outline III.B — premium receipts and effective date.
Reference Outline III.B — Premium receipts: binding/temporary insurance agreement
An applicant completes a life insurance application but does not submit the initial premium with it. Under contract law, which party makes the OFFER in this transaction?
Why: With no premium attached, the application is only an invitation to the insurer to make an offer; the issued policy is the offer, and the applicant accepts by paying the initial premium (and signing the statement of good health) at delivery. Choice A is correct only in the other fact pattern — when the premium accompanies the application, the applicant is the offeror and the insurer accepts by issuing the policy as applied for. Outline III.D — contract law.
Reference Outline III.D — Contract law: offer and acceptance
An insurer issues a life policy even though one health question on the application was left entirely blank. Nine months later the insured dies of a condition that the unanswered question would have revealed. What is the likely result?
Why: Accepting an application with an obvious blank and issuing the policy anyway waives the missing information; the insurer cannot later rely on an omission it chose to overlook. The correct procedure is to return the incomplete application to the applicant for completion before issue. Choice A ignores that the insurer's own acceptance created the waiver. Outline III.A — incomplete applications.
Reference Outline III.A — Incomplete applications and waiver
In deciding whether a misstatement on a life insurance application is "material," the controlling test is whether:
Why: Materiality is measured by the effect the truth would have had on the underwriting decision — issuance, amount, rate, or terms — under s. 627.409, F.S. Intent, choice A, matters for the separate fraud ground; an entirely innocent but material misstatement is still enough to defeat recovery during the contestable period. Outline III.C.
Reference s. 627.409, F.S. — materiality of representations
An insurer declines an application partly because of information contained in a consumer report. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the insurer must:
Why: When an adverse underwriting decision is based in whole or in part on a consumer report, FCRA requires an adverse action notice identifying the consumer reporting agency so the applicant can obtain the file and dispute errors. The insurer does not supply the report itself, choice A — the reporting agency does — and the reinvestigation duty in choice C also belongs to the agency, not the insurer. Outline III.C.
Reference Outline III.C — FCRA adverse action notice